<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Troubleshooting on No Semicolons</title><link>https://nosemicolons.com/tags/troubleshooting/</link><description>Recent content in Troubleshooting on No Semicolons</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2026 09:09:03 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://nosemicolons.com/tags/troubleshooting/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>The AI Code Generation Error Recovery Playbook: How to Debug Generated Code When Stack Traces Point to Functions You Didn't Write</title><link>https://nosemicolons.com/posts/debugging-ai-generated-code-playbook/</link><pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2026 09:09:03 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://nosemicolons.com/posts/debugging-ai-generated-code-playbook/</guid><description>&lt;p>You&amp;rsquo;re staring at a stack trace that might as well be written in ancient Sanskrit. The error is coming from a function called &lt;code>processNestedDataStructure()&lt;/code> that you definitely didn&amp;rsquo;t write, but your AI coding assistant did. Welcome to the modern developer&amp;rsquo;s nightmare: debugging code you don&amp;rsquo;t understand because you didn&amp;rsquo;t create it.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>This scenario is becoming increasingly common as we lean more heavily on AI code generation. The tools are incredible—they can scaffold entire modules, implement complex algorithms, and handle edge cases we might miss. But when something goes wrong, we&amp;rsquo;re left debugging someone else&amp;rsquo;s (or something else&amp;rsquo;s) logic without the mental model that comes from writing it ourselves.&lt;/p></description></item></channel></rss>