<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Software Quality on No Semicolons</title><link>https://nosemicolons.com/tags/software-quality/</link><description>Recent content in Software Quality on No Semicolons</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2026 08:40:14 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://nosemicolons.com/tags/software-quality/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>The AI Code Generation Speed Trap: Why 10x Faster Development Led to 3x More Bugs</title><link>https://nosemicolons.com/posts/ai-code-generation-speed-trap-bugs/</link><pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2026 08:40:14 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://nosemicolons.com/posts/ai-code-generation-speed-trap-bugs/</guid><description>&lt;p>Have you ever felt like a coding superhero with AI by your side, cranking out features at lightning speed, only to spend the next week drowning in bug reports? You&amp;rsquo;re not alone, and you&amp;rsquo;re definitely not imagining it.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>After tracking my development metrics for six months across three different projects—two with heavy AI assistance and one traditional approach—I discovered something that initially made me question everything I thought I knew about AI-powered development. While my coding speed increased by roughly 10x when leaning heavily on AI code generation, my bug rate shot up by 300%.&lt;/p></description></item></channel></rss>