<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Software-Ethics on No Semicolons</title><link>https://nosemicolons.com/tags/software-ethics/</link><description>Recent content in Software-Ethics on No Semicolons</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Apr 2026 08:35:34 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://nosemicolons.com/tags/software-ethics/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>The AI Code Ownership Dilemma: Who's Responsible When Generated Code Fails?</title><link>https://nosemicolons.com/posts/ai-code-ownership-responsibility-legal/</link><pubDate>Sun, 05 Apr 2026 08:35:34 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://nosemicolons.com/posts/ai-code-ownership-responsibility-legal/</guid><description>&lt;p>Picture this: It&amp;rsquo;s 3 AM, your production system is down, and the root cause traces back to a function that Claude generated for you three weeks ago. Your CTO is asking hard questions, your users are frustrated, and suddenly that &amp;ldquo;productivity boost&amp;rdquo; from AI coding doesn&amp;rsquo;t feel so straightforward anymore.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>Who&amp;rsquo;s responsible when AI-generated code fails? It&amp;rsquo;s a question that&amp;rsquo;s keeping more developers and engineering leaders awake at night, and honestly, we&amp;rsquo;re all still figuring it out together.&lt;/p></description></item></channel></rss>